tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3694316236173314997.post3685250457173409917..comments2023-03-05T15:54:56.474+00:00Comments on REALITY and ILLUSION: Francois Hollande: a traitorous French politicianSakib Ahmadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09684519231128535788noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3694316236173314997.post-66929707667032092292015-11-24T19:32:54.150+00:002015-11-24T19:32:54.150+00:00More pithy comments by Paul Craig Roberts:
The Pa...More pithy comments by Paul Craig Roberts:<br /><br />The Paris attack is playing out as I expected. The French government is attacking French civil liberty with legislation similar to the US PATRIOT Act.<br /><br />Readers in France have informed me that 84% of the French people, according to a poll, are content to be spied upon as long as it keeps them safe. This means that only 16% of the French nation is not brain dead.<br /><br />Another reader informs me that a TV news station read a letter left behind by one of the alleged ISIL bombers, a letter written in perfect English. Really! I mean, Really! Those with their secret agendas know how stupid the Western peoples are, collectively a hopeless basket case.<br /><br />French and American politicians are demanding that NATO Article 5 be used to put NATO boots on the ground in Syria. This is important not in order to fight ISIL, which the Russians are successfully doing, but to overthrow Assad under the pretext of fighting ISIL, a crazy policy that could bring conflict with Russia.<br /><br />To insure that no one is informed of the true facts by the English language Russian media, such as RT and Sputnik, the US Senate arranged hearings on foreign propaganda. Kenneth Weinstein, a member of the US Broadcasting Board of Governors, that is, the censors, told the senators that RT, Sputnik, and a variety of other truthful news sources are “well-funded state propaganda outlets.” In other words, only believe what you read in Washington-controlled propaganda outlets such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Fox News, CNN, BBC, NPR, and so forth.<br /><br />The aftermath of the Paris attack is like the aftermath of the so-called Boston Marathon Bombing. Fifty heavily armed police converged on two people and murdered them. The murdered female is described even by RT as a “female suicide bomber.” If the murdered woman is a suicide bomber, how is she still alive to be murdered by police? Not even the “Russian propaganda outlet” RT asks why 50 heavily armed police were unable to capture two people alive and had to kill them!<br /><br />A number of readers have sent to me information that indicates that the Paris attack was reported on both Wikipedia and Twitter the day before it occurred. http://bosniapress.info/index.php/news-in-english-articles/2459-paris-attack-reported-on-<br /> I do not know what to make of this. I do remember that the BBC reported the collapse of WTC building 7 prior to its collapse. The BBC reporter is actually standing in front of the still standing WTC 7 as she makes the report of its collapse. In other words, orchestration mistakes occur. But hardly any of the brainwashed pubic notices.<br />Sakib Ahmadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09684519231128535788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3694316236173314997.post-39375139093876121702015-11-24T12:00:59.106+00:002015-11-24T12:00:59.106+00:00.... continued from previous comment:
It is inter....... continued from previous comment:<br /><br />It is interesting that terrorists attacks attributed to Muslims only fall upon ordinary people, not upon the political elites who oppress the Muslims. In past years on several occasions I have remarked in my columns on the total vulnerability of the neoconservatives to assassination. Yet there has been not a single attack by terrortists on a neocon life, and the neocons are the source of the violence that Washington has unleashed on the Muslim world. The neocons walk around without threat free as birds.<br /><br />How believeable is it that Muslim terrorists take their ire out on innocents when the President of France himself, who has sent military forces to murder Muslims, was sitting in the attacked stadium and could easily have been eliminated by a suicide bomber?<br /><br />Now let us turn to questions of identification of the alleged “Paris terrorists.” Is it realistic to suppose that the millions of refugees from Washington and its European vassals’ wars in the Middle East have passports? Were these millions of refugees expecting to be driven by White Civilization’s Bombs out of their countries and thus had prepared themselves with passports in order to flee?<br /><br />Did they write on their passport applications that they were going to be visiting Europe?<br /><br />Was the beleaguered country, their homeland, under full military assault, able to process all these millions of passports?<br /><br />What sort of dumbshit Western media goes along with the passport story — a media well paid to lie for Washington’s hegemony and crimes?<br /><br />One final question for skeptics. Where are the photographs of the terrorists during their terrorizing? Surrounding the scenes of violence there were not only abundant security cameras, but also hundreds, even thousands, of people with cell phones that have cameras. With all of these photos, how is it possible that the authorities do not know if some terrorists escaped, and if so, who they are and what they look like? Why are the authorities relying on fake passports for photos of the terrorists?<br /><br />Terrorism has been unleashed in the Western World, and it is the terrorism of Western governments against Western peoples.Sakib Ahmadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09684519231128535788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3694316236173314997.post-89904265400856122462015-11-24T11:59:35.704+00:002015-11-24T11:59:35.704+00:00More Paris Puzzles — Paul Craig Roberts
November 1...More Paris Puzzles — Paul Craig Roberts<br />November 17, 2015 | Categories: Articles & Columns | Tags: | Print This Article Print This Article<br /><br />Some people who are not inclined to believe the official story of the Paris attack are troubled by the question why Muslim suicide bombers would blow themselves up for a false flag attack. The answer to this question is very simple. But first we should dispose of the question whether suicide bombers did blow themselves up. Is this something that we know, or is it part of the story that we are told? For example, we were told that during 9/11 passengers in hijacked airliners used their cell phones to call relatives, but experts have testified that the technology of the time did not permit cell phone calls from airliners at those altitudes.<br /><br />To dispose of the question whether we have or do not have any real evidence that suicide bombers blew themselves up, I will assume that they did.<br /><br />So we have suicide bombers blowing themselves up.<br /><br />Now turn to the question that troubles some doubters: Why would suicide bombers blow themselves up for the sake of a false flag attack?<br /><br />As I said, the answer is simple: Why assume that the suicide bombers knew who was organizing the attack? There seems to be abundant evidence that ISIL is a US creation, one that is still dependent on US active or passive support—thus the conflict between Putin and Washington over attacking ISIL. ISIL seems to be what Washington used to overthrow the government in Libya and afterward was sent by Washington to Syria to overthrow Assad. Obviously, Washington has ISIL infiltrated. Washington has long proven is ability to use Islamic extremists. As Washington used them in Afghanistan against the Soviets and in Libya and Syria against independent governments, Washington used them in Paris. By my last count, the FBI on 150 occasions has successfully deceived people into participating into FBI orchestrated “terror plots.”<br /><br />Now let us move to some bigger questions. Why do terrorists attack ordinary innocent people who have neither awareness of “their” government’s actions or control over them? The victims of 9/11 were not the neocons and members of the Washington establishment, whose policies in the Middle East justified attacks on their persons. Ditto for the Boston Marathon Bombing, and ditto for the Paris attacks. Innocents were the victims, not those who have taken Muslim lives.<br /><br />Historically, terror attacks are not on the innocent but on the rulers and those who are guilty. For example, it was the Archduke of Austria/Hungary who was assassinated by the Serbian terrorist, not ordinary people blown up or shot down in a street cafe.<br /><br />(continued.....)Sakib Ahmadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09684519231128535788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3694316236173314997.post-91176560795490345382015-11-16T02:39:25.598+00:002015-11-16T02:39:25.598+00:00“We Were Prepared”: Counter-Terrorism Emergency Ex...“We Were Prepared”: Counter-Terrorism Emergency Exercise on “Multi-Site Attacks” Took Place On Same Day As Paris Terrorist Attacks<br /><br />By Sean Adl-Tabatabai<br />Global Research, November 15, 2015<br />Your News Wire 15 November 2015<br /><br />Patrick Pelloux revealed on national radio on Saturday that a “multi-site” emergency exercise was held in Paris on the same day as the Paris attacks on November 13.<br /><br />[This exercise pertains to an emergency scenario of a terrorist attack. It involves first responders, police, emergency services and medical personnel. Organized by SAMU. It is not a military exercise, GR ed.] <br /><br />He said that the Paris emergency services were so well prepared, because “by chance” they had been planning for a similar scenario.<br /><br />Transcript:<br /><br />“By chance”, (le hasard a fait”) in the morning at the Paris SAMU (EMT), a multi-site attack exercise had been planned.”<br /><br />“So we were prepared. What needs to be known is there was a mobilisation of police forces, firemen, EMTs, associations who came [to participate] and we tried to save as many people as possible.”<br /><br />Sakib Ahmadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09684519231128535788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3694316236173314997.post-85123047404890120292015-11-16T02:28:03.723+00:002015-11-16T02:28:03.723+00:00EXTRACTED FROM A REPORT BY PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS:
Fr...EXTRACTED FROM A REPORT BY PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS:<br /><br />French Security Left Blind During November 13 Paris Terror Attacks<br /><br />By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts<br />Paul Craig Roberts 16 November 2015<br /><br />I have received a report from European security that there was a massive cyber attack on French systems 48 hours prior to and during the Paris attacks.<br /><br />Amongst other things, the attack took down the French mobile data network and blinded police surveillance. The attack was not a straightforward DDOS attack but a sophisticated attack that targeted a weakness in infrastructure hardware.<br /><br />Such an attack is beyond the capability of most organizations and requires capability that is unlikely to be in ISIL’s arsenal. An attack on this scale is difficult to pull off without authorities getting wind of it. The coordination required suggests state involvement.<br /><br />It is common for people with no experience in government to believe that false flag attacks are not possible, because they think the entire government would have to be involved and not everyone would go along with it. Someone would talk. However, if the report I have received is correct, hardly anyone has to be involved, and security forces are simply disabled.<br /><br />Remember the reports that during 9/11, a simulation of the actual events that were occuring was being conducted, thus confusing responsible parties about the reality.<br /><br />I am unable to reveal any further information.<br /><br />If security experts find the information credible, they should direct their inquiries to the French authorities.<br /><br />Copyright © Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Paul Craig Roberts, 2015<br />Sakib Ahmadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09684519231128535788noreply@blogger.com